Riva TNT2 vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Riva TNT2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
780 Rev. 2 outperforms Riva TNT2 by a whopping 96700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 487 | 1587 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.09 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.00 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Fahrenheit (1998−2000) |
| GPU code name | GK110B | NV5 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 September 2013 (12 years ago) | 12 October 1999 (26 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 125 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 15 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 250 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 173.2 | 0.25 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.156 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 48 | 2 |
| TMUs | 192 | 2 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 16 MB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz | 150 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | 2.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x VGA |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 6.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.5 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.68 | 0.01 |
| Recency | 10 September 2013 | 12 October 1999 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 250 nm |
GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 96700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Riva TNT2 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
