Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
ATI Radeon HD 4830 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Combined performance score
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 outperforms Radeon HD 4830 by 381% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 399 | 817 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 1.49 | 0.71 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
GPU code name | GK110B | RV770 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 10 September 2013 (10 years old) | 21 October 2008 (15 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $130 |
Current price | $270 (0.4x MSRP) | $31 (0.2x MSRP) |
GTX 780 Rev. 2 has 110% better value for money than ATI HD 4830.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 95 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 173.2 | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 246 mm |
Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.5 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 10.34 | 2.15 |
Recency | 10 September 2013 | 21 October 2008 |
Cost | $649 | $130 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 95 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4830 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.