Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013, $649
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.77

RTX 6000 outperforms 780 Rev. 2 by a whopping 338% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
RTX 6000 RTX 6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48799
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.102.31
Power efficiency3.0012.65
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110BTU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 September 2013 (12 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 6000 has 110% better value for money than GTX 780 Rev. 2.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044608
Core clock speed863 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate173.2509.8
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs192288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache192 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache1536 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.57.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.77 42.81
Recency 10 September 2013 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has 4% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 338.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
ATI X1650 XT Radeon X1650 XT
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
T400 T400
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
HD Graphics 5500 HD Graphics 5500
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 650 GTX 650
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
E9550 MXM Radeon E9550 MXM
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 142 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or Quadro RTX 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.