Quadro K4000 vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with Quadro K4000, including specs and performance data.
780 Rev. 2 outperforms K4000 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 486 | 612 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.10 | 0.25 |
| Power efficiency | 3.00 | 6.24 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GK110B | GK106 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 September 2013 (12 years ago) | 1 March 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $1,269 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
GTX 780 Rev. 2 has 340% better value for money than Quadro K4000.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 173.2 | 51.84 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.156 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 24 |
| TMUs | 192 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | 384 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | 134.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
| CUDA | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.76 | 6.50 |
| Recency | 10 September 2013 | 1 March 2013 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 80 Watt |
GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 50.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.
Quadro K4000, on the other hand, has 212.5% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4000 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K4000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
