Quadro 5000M vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000M 2000M 3000M 3000M X2 4000M 5000M 5010M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with Quadro 5000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013, $649
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.77
+98.6%

780 Rev. 2 outperforms 5000M by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
Quadro 5000M Quadro 5000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking487676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
Power efficiency3.003.78
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK110BGF100
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 September 2013 (12 years ago)27 July 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304320
Core clock speed863 MHz405 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate173.216.20
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs19240
L1 Cache192 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1792 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s76.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.77 4.92
Recency 10 September 2013 27 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1792 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 98.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 71.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 5000M, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
Quadro 5000M Quadro 5000M
vs
K4000M Quadro K4000M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
GT 520 OEM GT 520 OEM
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
GT 620 OEM GT 620 OEM
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
510 OEM GeForce 510 OEM
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
ION HX ION HX
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 8500 All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or Quadro 5000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.