HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Braswell) (Broadwell) (Haswell) (Ivy Bridge) (Sandy Bridge) (Skylake)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013, $649
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.77
+1584%

780 Rev. 2 outperforms HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) by a whopping 1584% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4911271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
Power efficiency3.00no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2012)
GPU code nameGK110BIvy Bridge GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2013 (12 years ago)1 October 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23046
Core clock speed863 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate173.2no data
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs192no data
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+1567%
9
−1567%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 11
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 780 Rev. 2 and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 Rev. 2 is 1567% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 32 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.77 0.58
Recency 10 September 2013 1 October 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 1584.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5470 Mobility Radeon HD 5470
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R9 M485X M485X
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 675MX GeForce GTX 675MX
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R9 M280X M280X
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
HD 8730M 8730M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R5 M330 M330
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
HD 6250 6250
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R7 M445 M445
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R9 M365X M365X
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 470M GeForce GTX 470M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4870 4870

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 62 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.