GeForce GTX 765M vs GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
760A 760M 765M 765M SLI 770M 770M SLI 775M 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 780M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with GeForce GTX 765M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013, $649
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.76
+103%

780 Rev. 2 outperforms 765M by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
GTX 765M GTX 765M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking486680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
Power efficiency3.004.93
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK110BGK106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2013 (12 years ago)30 May 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed863 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz863 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate173.255.23
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS1.326 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs19264
L1 Cache192 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI++
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.5+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p100−110
+96.1%
51
−96.1%
Full HD80−85
+100%
40
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 107
+0%
107
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 780 Rev. 2 and GTX 765M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 Rev. 2 is 96% faster in 900p
  • GTX 780 Rev. 2 is 100% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.76 4.81
Recency 10 September 2013 30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 102.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 765M, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 765M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
GTX 765M GeForce GTX 765M
vs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 Iris Pro Graphics P580
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
RX 6900 RX 6900
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
PRO W7800 PRO W7800
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Arc A570M Arc A570M
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
GTX 780 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1900 G5 Mac Edition Radeon X1900 G5 Mac Edition
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1900 GT Radeon X1900 GT
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1900 XTX Radeon X1900 XTX
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Stream Processor Stream Processor
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
HD 6970M Mac Edition HD 6970M Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 81 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or GeForce GTX 765M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.