GeForce G102M vs GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G mGPU Intel 9100M G mGPU Intel 9200M 9400M 9400M G G102M G205M ION

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with GeForce G102M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013, $649
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.77
+2343%

780 Rev. 2 outperforms G102M by a whopping 2343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce G102M GeForce G102M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4911330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
Power efficiency3.002.20
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK110BC79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2013 (12 years ago)8 January 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed863 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate173.23.600
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs484
TMUs1928
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 1.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.77 0.40
Recency 10 September 2013 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 14 Watt

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 2342.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G102M, on the other hand, has 1685.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G102M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce G102M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GeForce G102M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
GeForce G102M GeForce G102M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5145 Mobility Radeon HD 5145
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
6200 X2 PCI GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
NX-SoC NX SoC
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Vega 6 Mobile Efficient Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Pro W5300M Radeon Pro W5300M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Tegra X1 GPU Tegra X1 GPU
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Arc 5 A550M Arc 5 A550M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Jetson TX1 Jetson TX1

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 49 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or GeForce G102M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.