GeForce 8700M GT SLI vs GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G 8200M G mGPU AMD 8200M G mGPU Intel 8400M G 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 8600M GT 8600M GT Mac Edition 8600M GT SLI 8700M GT 8700M GT SLI 8800M GTS 8800M GTX 8800M GTX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with GeForce 8700M GT SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013, $649
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.77
+1238%

780 Rev. 2 outperforms 8700M SLI by a whopping 1238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
8700M GT SLI 8700M GT SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4911221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
Power efficiency3.000.97
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)G8x (2007)
GPU code nameGK110BNB8E-SE
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2013 (12 years ago)18 September 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230464
Core clock speed863 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million578 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt58 Watt
Texture fill rate173.2no data
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs192no data
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.77 0.73
Recency 10 September 2013 18 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 58 Watt

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 1238.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

8700M GT SLI, on the other hand, has 331% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8700M GT SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M GT SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
8700M GT SLI GeForce 8700M GT SLI
vs
ATI Mobility HD 550v Mobility Radeon HD 550v
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
RX 7700S Radeon RX 7700S
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
RX 7600S Radeon RX 7600S
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R7 M360 Radeon R7 M360
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R5 M255 Radeon R5 M255
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7340 Radeon HD 7340
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 1024SP Radeon RX 460 1024SP
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R5 235 OEM Radeon R5 235 OEM
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7650M Rebrand Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GeForce 945A GeForce 945A
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 780M Mac Edition GTX 780M Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or GeForce 8700M GT SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.