Tesla M2070 vs GeForce GTX 775M

Place in the ranking	463	634
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.10
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	N13E-GTX-A2	GF100
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	24 September 2013 (10 years ago)	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$3,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	448
Core clock speed	719 MHz	574 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	32.14
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.03 gflops
ROPs	no data	48
TMUs	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	248 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	150.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

+114%

7−8
−114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +110%	30−33 −110%
Hitman 3	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +117%	24−27 −117%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +110%	30−33 −110%
Hitman 3	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +117%	24−27 −117%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +110%	30−33 −110%
Hitman 3	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +117%	24−27 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+117%

12−14

−117%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +95.2%	21−24 −95.2%
Hitman 3	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +100%	30−33 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+100%

8−9
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Hitman 3	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +117%	18−20 −117%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+125%

4−5

−125%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.42	4.88
Recency	24 September 2013	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	225 Watt

GTX 775M has a 93% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2070, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2070 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook card while Tesla M2070 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.