GeForce GTX 1660 vs GTX 775M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M with GeForce GTX 1660, including specs and performance data.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
8.34

1660 outperforms 775M by a whopping 216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking518232
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.05
Power efficiency6.7317.71
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2TU116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 September 2013 (12 years ago)14 March 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13441408
Core clock speed719 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.1
Floating-point processing powerno data5.027 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data88
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz2001 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 775M 8.34
GTX 1660 26.33
+216%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3688
Samples: 46
GTX 1660 11643
+216%
Samples: 7878

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071
GTX 1660 21064
+247%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 775M 11938
GTX 1660 57958
+385%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−246%
83
+246%
1440p14−16
−257%
50
+257%
4K8−9
−238%
27
+238%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.64
1440pno data4.38
4Kno data8.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−477%
271
+477%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−294%
71
+294%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−394%
79
+394%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
−174%
100−110
+174%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−374%
223
+374%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−222%
58
+222%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−245%
100
+245%
Fortnite 50−55
−146%
130−140
+146%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−238%
132
+238%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−270%
100
+270%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−269%
59
+269%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−253%
110−120
+253%
Valorant 85−90
−248%
306
+248%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
−174%
100−110
+174%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−128%
107
+128%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−97.8%
270−280
+97.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−161%
47
+161%
Dota 2 65−70
−232%
219
+232%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−217%
92
+217%
Fortnite 50−55
−146%
130−140
+146%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−215%
123
+215%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−226%
88
+226%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−248%
115
+248%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−188%
46
+188%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−217%
57
+217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−253%
110−120
+253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−343%
102
+343%
Valorant 85−90
−226%
287
+226%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−174%
100−110
+174%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−122%
40
+122%
Dota 2 65−70
−198%
197
+198%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−197%
86
+197%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−151%
98
+151%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−125%
36
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−253%
110−120
+253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−148%
57
+148%
Valorant 85−90
−30.7%
115
+30.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
−146%
130−140
+146%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−265%
62
+265%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−191%
190−200
+191%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−333%
52
+333%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−230%
33
+230%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−187%
129
+187%
Valorant 95−100
−128%
226
+128%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−267%
75−80
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−243%
24
+243%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−211%
59
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−262%
76
+262%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−140%
24
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−269%
45−50
+269%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−433%
16
+433%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−145%
49
+145%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−400%
20
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35
+289%
Valorant 45−50
−172%
125
+172%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
−340%
40−45
+340%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10
+233%
Dota 2 30−35
−164%
87
+164%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−233%
50
+233%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−225%
13
+225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−256%
30−35
+256%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−267%
30−35
+267%

This is how GTX 775M and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 246% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 257% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 is 238% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 is 867% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 surpassed GTX 775M in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.34 26.33
Recency 24 September 2013 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 775M has 20% lower power consumption.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has a 215.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 6144 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 775M or GeForce GTX 1660, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.