GeForce 9200 vs GTX 775M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M with GeForce 9200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.46
+2050%

GTX 775M outperforms 9200 by a whopping 2050% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4731249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.510.76
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2C79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 September 2013 (11 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134416
Core clock speed719 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3600 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.46
+2050%
GeForce 9200 0.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634
+2050%
GeForce 9200 169

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Valorant 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Fortnite 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Valorant 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
World of Tanks 130−140
+2200%
6−7
−2200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Valorant 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1
World of Tanks 65−70
+2167%
3−4
−2167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Dota 2 20−22 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 20−22 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Valorant 9−10 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.46 0.44
Recency 24 September 2013 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 775M has a 2050% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook card while GeForce 9200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
NVIDIA GeForce 9200
GeForce 9200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 25 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.