Radeon RX 8050S vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5500M 5600M 6550M 6600M 6800M 7600M 7600M XT 7700S 7900M 8040S 8050S 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and Radeon RX 8050S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 775M Mac Edition
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
3.07

8050S outperforms 775M Mac Edition by a whopping 1070% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 775M Mac Edition GTX 775M Mac Edition
RX 8050S RX 8050S

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking810155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.36no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK104no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 November 2013 (12 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134432
Core clock speed797 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2800 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate89.26no data
Floating-point processing power2.142 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−1075%
94
+1075%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+0%
118
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how GTX 775M Mac Edition and RX 8050S compete in popular games:

  • RX 8050S is 1075% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.07 35.92
Recency 8 November 2013 6 January 2025

RX 8050S has a 1070% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 years.

The Radeon RX 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon RX 8050S
Radeon RX 8050S
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 560M GeForce GTX 560M
RX 8050S Radeon RX 8050S
vs
RTX 2080 Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
GeForce 930MX GeForce 930MX
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000-8Q
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
vs
GTX 775M Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
GT 740M GT 740M
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
GT 735M GT 735M
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
GT 720M GT 720M
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
HD Graphics 5300 Graphics 5300
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
8800M GTX SLI GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 32 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition or Radeon RX 8050S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.