Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Place in performance ranking	694	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	85
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.27	27.82
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	GK104	Navi 31 XTX
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 November 2013 (10 years ago)	3 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	$149	$859 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 XTX has 10204% better value for money than GTX 775M Mac Edition.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	6144
Core clock speed	797 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2270 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	355 Watt
Texture fill rate	89.26	959.6
Floating-point performance	2,142 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	287 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.0	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −2380%	248 +2380%
1440p	7−8 −2414%	176 +2414%
4K	4−5 −2775%	115 +2775%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.43	79.95
Recency	8 November 2013	3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	355 Watt