Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5300M 5500M 5600M 5700M 6550M 6600M 6650M 6800M 7600M XT 7700S 7900M 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and Radeon RX 5300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 775M Mac Edition
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
3.06

RX 5300M outperforms GTX 775M Mac Edition by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 775M Mac Edition GTX 775M Mac Edition
RX 5300M RX 5300M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking788435
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.3310.50
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 November 2013 (11 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13441408
Core clock speed797 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1445 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate89.26127.2
Floating-point processing power2.142 TFLOPS4.069 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−288%
62
+288%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+0%
64
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
+0%
71
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+0%
38
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 58
+0%
58
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
God of War 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
God of War 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how GTX 775M Mac Edition and RX 5300M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5300M is 288% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.06 11.70
Recency 8 November 2013 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 85 Watt

RX 5300M has a 282.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
RX 5300M Radeon RX 5300M
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
GT 420M GeForce GT 420M
vs
GeForce 945A GeForce 945A
310 OEM GeForce 310 OEM
vs
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
GTX 550 Ti GTX 550 Ti
vs
GTX 960A GTX 960A
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
vs
GT 730A GeForce GT 730A
R7 A260 Radeon R7 A260
vs
GeForce 820A GeForce 820A
Graphics 128SP Radeon Graphics 128SP
vs
GT 740A GeForce GT 740A
R9 FURY X2 Radeon R9 FURY X2
vs
RX 580 XTR Radeon RX 580 XTR
RTX 3060 3060
vs
RX 580 XTR RX 580 XTR
RX 580 XTR RX 580 XTR
vs
RX 6800 RX 6800
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 32 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 98 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition or Radeon RX 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.