Quadro T600 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Place in the ranking	739	305
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.33	31.63
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GK104	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	8 November 2013 (11 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	896
Core clock speed	797 MHz	780 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1410 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	89.26	78.96
Floating-point processing power	2.142 TFLOPS	2.527 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.0	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

9−10

−467%

51
+467%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	53 +0%	53 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	116 +0%	116 +0%
Far Cry 5	49 +0%	49 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	63 +0%	63 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52 +0%	52 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
World of Tanks	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	107 +0%	107 +0%
Far Cry 5	45 +0%	45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +0%	28 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

95−100

+0%

95−100

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

This is how GTX 775M Mac Edition and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

T600 Mobile is 467% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.38	18.38
Recency	8 November 2013	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	40 Watt

T600 Mobile has a 443.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.