Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs GeForce GTX 770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M with Radeon Pro Vega 20, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.24

Pro Vega 20 outperforms GTX 770M by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.47no data
Power efficiency6.629.43
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Vega 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)14 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9601280
Core clock speed811 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1283 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate63.76102.6
Floating-point processing power1.53 TFLOPS3.284 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs8080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz740 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s189.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 7.24
Pro Vega 20 13.75
+89.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2791
Pro Vega 20 5299
+89.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M 4889
Pro Vega 20 12289
+151%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 770M 19208
Pro Vega 20 33590
+74.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 770M 3347
Pro Vega 20 9044
+170%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 770M 23513
Pro Vega 20 62318
+165%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 770M 8652
Pro Vega 20 26775
+209%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
−20.4%
59
+20.4%
4K21−24
−95.2%
41
+95.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.88no data
4K9.05no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−110%
40−45
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−155%
51
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−65.1%
70−75
+65.1%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−119%
45−50
+119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−90%
35−40
+90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−217%
76
+217%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−37%
70−75
+37%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−110%
40−45
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−130%
46
+130%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−65.1%
70−75
+65.1%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−119%
45−50
+119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−90%
35−40
+90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−37%
70−75
+37%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−65.1%
70−75
+65.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−40.9%
31
+40.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−37%
70−75
+37%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−90%
35−40
+90%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−169%
70−75
+169%
Hitman 3 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−188%
21−24
+188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−84.8%
85−90
+84.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−83.3%
21−24
+83.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Hitman 3 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−179%
65−70
+179%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

This is how GTX 770M and Pro Vega 20 compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 20 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 20 is 95% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro Vega 20 is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro Vega 20 surpassed GTX 770M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.24 13.75
Recency 30 May 2013 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 770M has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 20, on the other hand, has a 89.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 127 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 87 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.