Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce GTX 770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
6.26

AI PRO R9700 outperforms 770M by a whopping 1087% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
Power efficiency6.7319.99
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK106Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9604096
Core clock speed811 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate63.76747.5
Floating-point processing power1.53 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs24128
TMUs80256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 770M 6.26
AI PRO R9700 74.32
+1087%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2766
Samples: 1129
AI PRO R9700 32859
+1088%
Samples: 7

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 770M 8555
AI PRO R9700 184684
+2059%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−1076%
600−650
+1076%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.73no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−961%
350−400
+961%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−961%
350−400
+961%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−1043%
240−250
+1043%
Fortnite 40−45
−998%
450−500
+998%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−1050%
230−240
+1050%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−1060%
290−300
+1060%
Valorant 70−75
−1064%
850−900
+1064%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−961%
350−400
+961%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 151
−1059%
1750−1800
+1059%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Dota 2 50−55
−1032%
600−650
+1032%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−1043%
240−250
+1043%
Fortnite 40−45
−998%
450−500
+998%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−1050%
230−240
+1050%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−1067%
280−290
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−1060%
290−300
+1060%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1067%
210−220
+1067%
Valorant 70−75
−1064%
850−900
+1064%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Dota 2 50−55
−1032%
600−650
+1032%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−1043%
240−250
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−1060%
290−300
+1060%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1067%
210−220
+1067%
Valorant 70−75
−1064%
850−900
+1064%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
−998%
450−500
+998%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−1054%
600−650
+1054%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1054%
450−500
+1054%
Valorant 75−80
−1033%
850−900
+1033%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1025%
180−190
+1025%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−1067%
210−220
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Dota 2 24−27
−1067%
280−290
+1067%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

This is how GTX 770M and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 1076% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.26 74.32
Recency 30 May 2013 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 770M has 300% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1087.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 136 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 770M or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.