Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI with Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, including specs and performance data.


GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
12.52

5700 XT 50th Anniversary outperforms 770M SLI by a whopping 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking437122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.48
Power efficiency6.4313.57
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)7 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19202560
Core clock speed811 MHz1680 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1980 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data316.8
Floating-point processing powerno data10.14 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−214%
220−230
+214%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−214%
220−230
+214%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Fortnite 70−75
−211%
230−240
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−215%
170−180
+215%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−214%
220−230
+214%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−209%
550−600
+209%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Dota 2 85−90
−206%
260−270
+206%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Fortnite 70−75
−211%
230−240
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−215%
170−180
+215%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−213%
150−160
+213%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Dota 2 85−90
−206%
260−270
+206%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−215%
170−180
+215%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
−211%
230−240
+211%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−213%
75−80
+213%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−216%
300−310
+216%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−188%
300−310
+188%
Valorant 130−140
−199%
400−450
+199%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
−204%
85−90
+204%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−213%
75−80
+213%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Valorant 65−70
−204%
210−220
+204%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Dota 2 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.52 39.64
Recency 30 May 2013 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has 50% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, on the other hand, has a 217% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 8310 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 770M SLI or Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.