ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4371601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.43no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameno dataRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920no data
Core clock speed811 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB64 MB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Valorant 65−70 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2013 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 436% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 770M SLI or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.