Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Place in the ranking	397	371
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.86	13.05
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	no data	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	768
Core clock speed	811 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	64.00
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	32
Tensor Cores	no data	96
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	124.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 11.93

Arc A310 13.28
+11.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569

Arc A310 11915
+24.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

30−35

−23.3%

37
+23.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −45.5%	32 +45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −9.5%	45−50 +9.5%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −40.9%	31 +40.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −53.8%	80 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −15.2%	35−40 +15.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
Valorant	50−55 −11.8%	55−60 +11.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −9.5%	45−50 +9.5%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −18.2%	26 +18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Dota 2	45−50 +64.3%	28 −64.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −8.3%	50−55 +8.3%
Fortnite	70−75 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −25%	65 +25%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −15.2%	35−40 +15.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +64.3%	28 −64.3%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −8.4%	100−110 +8.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −10.3%	40−45 +10.3%
Valorant	50−55 −11.8%	55−60 +11.8%
World of Tanks	170−180 −8.1%	180−190 +8.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −9.5%	45−50 +9.5%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −9.1%	24 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Dota 2	45−50 −8.7%	50−55 +8.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −8.3%	50−55 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −3.8%	54 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −15.2%	35−40 +15.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −8.4%	100−110 +8.4%
Valorant	50−55 −11.8%	55−60 +11.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −31.6%	120−130 +31.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
World of Tanks	90−95 −11.1%	100−105 +11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −16%	27−30 +16%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −13.3%	30−35 +13.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −10%	21−24 +10%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −14.8%	30−35 +14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Valorant	30−35 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Dota 2	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −10.5%	40−45 +10.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Dota 2	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Fortnite	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Valorant	12−14 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and Arc A310 compete in popular games:

Arc A310 is 23% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 64% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A310 is 54% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
Arc A310 is ahead in 53 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.93	13.28
Recency	30 May 2013	12 October 2022
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt

Arc A310 has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Arc A310 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.