Radeon R7 M460 vs GeForce GTX 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770 with Radeon R7 M460, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 230 Watt
15.33
+453%

GTX 770 outperforms R7 M460 by a whopping 453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking324763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.650.11
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameGK104Meso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)21 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$254 (0.6x MSRP)$900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770 has 3218% better value for money than R7 M460.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1046 MHz984 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1125 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate134 billion/sec27.00
Floating-point performance3,333 gflops864.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R7 M460 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 8-pin and one 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7012 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.3 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
PhysX+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770 15.33
+453%
R7 M460 2.77

GeForce GTX 770 outperforms Radeon R7 M460 by 453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 770 5921
+453%
R7 M460 1071

GeForce GTX 770 outperforms Radeon R7 M460 by 453% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 770 8150
+592%
R7 M460 1177

GeForce GTX 770 outperforms Radeon R7 M460 by 592% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+438%
13
−438%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+445%
10−12
−445%
Hitman 3 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+431%
16−18
−431%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+445%
10−12
−445%
Hitman 3 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+400%
7
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+431%
16−18
−431%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+445%
10−12
−445%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+428%
18−20
−428%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+431%
16−18
−431%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Hitman 3 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%

This is how GTX 770 and R7 M460 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 770 is 438% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.33 2.77
Recency 30 May 2013 21 February 2016

The GeForce GTX 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M460 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770 is a desktop card while Radeon R7 M460 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 770
AMD Radeon R7 M460
Radeon R7 M460

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1462 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 45 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.