Radeon RX 6800 XT vs GeForce GTX 765M

Place in performance ranking	585	24
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.53	28.04
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N14-GE	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	18 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649
Current price	$93	$696 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6800 XT has 5191% better value for money than GTX 765M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	4608
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	863 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.23	648.0
Floating-point performance	1,326 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon RX 6800 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP content protection	+	no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M 5.16

RX 6800 XT 64.73
+1154%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 765M by 1154% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 765M 1995

RX 6800 XT 25031
+1155%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 765M by 1155% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 765M 4019

RX 6800 XT 52046
+1195%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 765M by 1195% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 765M 14870

RX 6800 XT 96516
+549%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 765M by 549% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 765M 2479

RX 6800 XT 49735
+1906%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 765M by 1906% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 765M 17616

RX 6800 XT 193053
+996%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 765M by 996% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	51 −1076%	600−650 +1076%
Full HD	41 −385%	199 +385%
1440p	10−12 −1320%	142 +1320%
4K	7−8 −1214%	92 +1214%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−1289%

120−130
+1289%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −3060%	158 +3060%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −1485%	200−210 +1485%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −1136%	130−140 +1136%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −1289%	120−130 +1289%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −518%	100−110 +518%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −946%	130−140 +946%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −900%	190−200 +900%
Hitman 3	12−14 −1108%	140−150 +1108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1957%	432 +1957%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −1209%	144 +1209%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −771%	122 +771%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −2276%	404 +2276%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −2314%	169 +2314%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −2600%	135 +2600%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −1485%	200−210 +1485%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −1136%	130−140 +1136%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −1289%	120−130 +1289%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −241%	58 +241%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −377%	62 +377%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −900%	190−200 +900%
Hitman 3	12−14 −467%	68 +467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1743%	387 +1743%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −1027%	124 +1027%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −764%	121 +764%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1518%	275 +1518%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −2573%	294 +2573%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −2043%	150 +2043%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −2260%	118 +2260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −1136%	130−140 +1136%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −1289%	120−130 +1289%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −518%	100−110 +518%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −900%	190−200 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1229%	279 +1229%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −927%	113 +927%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1355%	160 +1355%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −1500%	112 +1500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−757%

120
+757%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −1390%	140−150 +1390%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1943%	143 +1943%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1875%	75−80 +1875%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2667%	83 +2667%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2267%	70−75 +2267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −1343%	100−110 +1343%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3200%	65−70 +3200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1538%	131 +1538%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1589%	150−160 +1589%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1692%	215 +1692%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −3633%	112 +3633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2750%	110−120 +2750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −4150%	85 +4150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	14−16 −186%	40 +186%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −4100%	126 +4100%
Hitman 3	1−2 −5500%	55−60 +5500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1840%	95−100 +1840%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −7900%	80 +7900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −10900%	110 +10900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −3150%	65 +3150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3450%	70−75 +3450%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	30−35
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2575%	100−110 +2575%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −2460%	128 +2460%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1467%	94 +1467%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −4800%	49 +4800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−1167%

76
+1167%

This is how GTX 765M and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is 1076% faster in 900p
RX 6800 XT is 385% faster in 1080p
RX 6800 XT is 1320% faster in 1440p
RX 6800 XT is 1214% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 10900% faster than the GTX 765M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6800 XT surpassed GTX 765M in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.16	64.73
Recency	30 May 2013	18 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	300 Watt