GeForce RTX 5090 vs GTX 765M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 765M SLI with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

GTX 765M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
10.67

RTX 5090 outperforms GTX 765M SLI by a whopping 837% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4381
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.80
Power efficiency5.6411.94
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB202
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153621760
Core clock speed850 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,637
Floating-point processing powerno data104.8 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
−186%
203
+186%
1440p18−20
−933%
186
+933%
4K14−16
−957%
148
+957%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.85
1440pno data10.75
4Kno data13.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
−904%
250−260
+904%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−1083%
210−220
+1083%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−1100%
240−250
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
−904%
250−260
+904%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−348%
190−200
+348%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−1083%
210−220
+1083%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−1100%
240−250
+1100%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−558%
210−220
+558%
Fortnite 60−65
−403%
300−350
+403%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−700%
300−350
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−862%
250−260
+862%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−392%
170−180
+392%
Valorant 90−95
−623%
650−700
+623%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
−904%
250−260
+904%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−348%
190−200
+348%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−1083%
210−220
+1083%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 197
−41.1%
270−280
+41.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−1100%
240−250
+1100%
Dota 2 70−75
−815%
650−700
+815%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−558%
210−220
+558%
Fortnite 60−65
−403%
300−350
+403%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−700%
300−350
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−862%
250−260
+862%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−358%
170−180
+358%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−245%
69
+245%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−392%
170−180
+392%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−1577%
400−450
+1577%
Valorant 90−95
−623%
650−700
+623%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−348%
190−200
+348%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−1022%
202
+1022%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−1100%
240−250
+1100%
Dota 2 70−75
−815%
650−700
+815%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−558%
210−220
+558%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−700%
300−350
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−823%
240−250
+823%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−392%
170−180
+392%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−1246%
350
+1246%
Valorant 90−95
−623%
650−700
+623%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
−403%
300−350
+403%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1308%
183
+1308%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−579%
500−550
+579%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1107%
160−170
+1107%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1736%
202
+1736%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−250%
170−180
+250%
Valorant 110−120
−337%
450−500
+337%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−684%
190−200
+684%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1850%
150−160
+1850%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−886%
200−210
+886%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1175%
300−350
+1175%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1906%
321
+1906%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−619%
150−160
+619%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
−1500%
128
+1500%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−4250%
174
+4250%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−790%
180−190
+790%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−2683%
167
+2683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−3050%
378
+3050%
Valorant 50−55
−526%
300−350
+526%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−1033%
130−140
+1033%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1275%
55
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2500%
75−80
+2500%
Dota 2 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1694%
300−350
+1694%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−967%
95−100
+967%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−778%
75−80
+778%

This is how GTX 765M SLI and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 186% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 933% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 957% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5090 is 4250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5090 surpassed GTX 765M SLI in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.67 100.00
Recency 30 May 2013 30 January 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 575 Watt

GTX 765M SLI has 342.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 837.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2054 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 765M SLI or GeForce RTX 5090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.