Radeon HD 7600G vs GeForce GTX 760M

Place in performance ranking	627	1100
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.78	0.01
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code name	N14E-GL	Trinity
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	1 September 2012 (11 years ago)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760M has 17700% better value for money than HD 7600G.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
Core clock speed	657 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	424 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	19 Watt
Texture fill rate	42.05	10.18
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon HD 7600G compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760M 4.45
+424%

HD 7600G 0.85

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Radeon HD 7600G by 424% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

GTX 760M 1720
+426%

HD 7600G 327

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Radeon HD 7600G by 426% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760M 3369
+436%

HD 7600G 628

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Radeon HD 7600G by 436% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760M 14007
+755%

HD 7600G 1639

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Radeon HD 7600G by 755% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	39 +457%	7−8 −457%
Full HD	46 +475%	8−9 −475%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9
+167%

3−4

−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Battlefield 5	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	9−10	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Hitman 3	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Battlefield 5	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	9−10	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Hitman 3	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	9−10	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5	0−1
Hitman 3	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+167%

3−4

−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1