Mobility Radeon HD 5850 vs GeForce GTX 760M

Place in performance ranking	622	855
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	1.69	0.29
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	N14E-GL	Broadway-PRO
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (10 years ago)	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price	$163	$153

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760M has 483% better value for money than ATI Mobility HD 5850.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	800
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	657 MHz	625 MHz
Boost clock speed	657 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,540 million	1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	39 Watt
Texture fill rate	42.05	20.00
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	800.0 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760M and Mobility Radeon HD 5850 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options	+	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP content protection	+	no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760M 4.44
+127%

ATI Mobility HD 5850 1.96

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5850 by 127% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760M 14007
+150%

ATI Mobility HD 5850 5592

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5850 by 150% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	39 +105%	19 −105%
Full HD	44 +76%	25 −76%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9
+100%

4−5

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Hitman 3	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Hitman 3	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Hitman 3	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1

This is how GTX 760M and ATI Mobility HD 5850 compete in popular games:

GTX 760M is 105% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5850 in 900p
GTX 760M is 76% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5850 in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 760M is 800% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 5850.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 760M is ahead in 46 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	4.44	1.96
Recency	30 May 2013	7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	39 Watt