GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GTX 760M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

We've compared laptop GPU GeForce GTX 760M with desktop GPU GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760M
2013
2048 MB GDDR5
4.44

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms GTX 760M by a whopping 1232% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking62429
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.70no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameN14E-GLAD106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (10 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$163 $461

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684352
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed657 MHzno data
Boost clock speed657 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05324.5
Floating-point performance1,009 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760M 4.44
RTX 4060 Ti 59.15
+1232%

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms GTX 760M by 1232% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760M 1717
RTX 4060 Ti 22892
+1233%

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms GTX 760M by 1233% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p39
−1182%
500−550
+1182%
Full HD44
−1150%
550−600
+1150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

This is how GTX 760M and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 1182% faster in 900p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 1150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.44 59.15
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 160 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GTX 760M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 95 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5388 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.