GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs 760M

Aggregate performance score

GTX 760M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
4.44

1060 5 GB outperforms 760M by a whopping 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking626218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7316.41
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN14E-GLGP106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)26 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price$163 $203

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 5 GB has 849% better value for money than GTX 760M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681280
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed657 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz1709 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05136.7
Floating-point performance1,009 gflops4,375 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB5 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz8008 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s160.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760M 4.44
GTX 1060 5 GB 23.43
+428%

1060 5 GB outperforms 760M by 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760M 1717
GTX 1060 5 GB 9058
+428%

1060 5 GB outperforms 760M by 428% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p39
−413%
200−210
+413%
Full HD44
−423%
230−240
+423%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Hitman 3 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Hitman 3 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Hitman 3 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hitman 3 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

This is how GTX 760M and GTX 1060 5 GB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 5 GB is 413% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1060 5 GB is 423% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.44 23.43
Recency 30 May 2013 26 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 120 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GTX 760M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 95 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 628 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.