GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs GTX 760A
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
775M Mac Edition outperforms 760A by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 812 | 802 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.09 | 2.35 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GK106 | GK104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 (11 years ago) | 8 November 2013 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 657 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 89.26 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.009 TFLOPS | 2.142 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1002 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.92 | 3.05 |
| Recency | 17 March 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
GTX 760A has an age advantage of 4 months, and 81.8% lower power consumption.
GTX 775M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
