Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 760A

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760A and Arc A380, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 760A
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
3.17

Arc A380 outperforms GTX 760A by a whopping 838% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking713175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.21
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGK106DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current priceno data$591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed628 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05131.2
Floating-point performance1,009 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed4008 MHz15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760A 3.17
Arc A380 29.73
+838%

Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 760A by 838% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760A 1226
Arc A380 6238
+409%

Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 760A by 409% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−1025%
45
+1025%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−917%
61
+917%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−900%
50
+900%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−857%
65−70
+857%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−850%
76
+850%
Hitman 3 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−910%
101
+910%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−863%
75−80
+863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−840%
94
+840%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1000%
55
+1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−900%
50
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1133%
37
+1133%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−857%
65−70
+857%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−925%
120−130
+925%
Hitman 3 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−883%
110−120
+883%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−863%
75−80
+863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−900%
80
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−843%
66
+843%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−867%
29
+867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−933%
31
+933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−857%
65−70
+857%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−850%
57
+850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−940%
52
+940%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−917%
61
+917%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1033%
34
+1033%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1150%
25
+1150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−863%
75−80
+863%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1020%
55−60
+1020%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−843%
65−70
+843%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−940%
50−55
+940%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1100%
35−40
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−933%
60−65
+933%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−850%
55−60
+850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−925%
40−45
+925%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

This is how GTX 760A and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 1025% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.17 29.73
Recency 17 March 2014 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 75 Watt

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760A in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 742 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.