Radeon R7 M270DX vs GeForce GTX 760

Place in performance ranking	370	797
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.43	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)
GPU code name	GK104	Topaz
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 June 2013 (11 years ago)	11 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data
Current price	$136 (0.5x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	384
CUDA cores	1152	no data
Core clock speed	980 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz	940 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	94.1 billion/sec	22.56
Floating-point performance	2,378 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Minimum recommended system power	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
PhysX	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.41
+398%

R7 M270DX 2.49

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon R7 M270DX by 398% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760 4793
+399%

R7 M270DX 961

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon R7 M270DX by 399% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

66
+450%

12−14

−450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

90−95
+374%

18−20

−374%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +380%	24−27 −380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +375%	20−22 −375%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +375%	40−45 −375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +380%	24−27 −380%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +374%	18−20 −374%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +383%	27−30 −383%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +371%	30−35 −371%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +383%	60−65 −383%
Hitman 3	110−120 +358%	24−27 −358%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 +390%	50−55 −390%
Metro Exodus	190−200 +375%	40−45 −375%
Red Dead Redemption 2	170−180 +386%	35−40 −386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +374%	35−40 −374%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200−210 +376%	40−45 −376%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +380%	24−27 −380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +375%	20−22 −375%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +375%	40−45 −375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +380%	24−27 −380%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +374%	18−20 −374%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +383%	27−30 −383%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +371%	30−35 −371%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +383%	60−65 −383%
Hitman 3	110−120 +358%	24−27 −358%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 +390%	50−55 −390%
Metro Exodus	190−200 +375%	40−45 −375%
Red Dead Redemption 2	170−180 +386%	35−40 −386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +374%	35−40 −374%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +362%	24−27 −362%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200−210 +376%	40−45 −376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +380%	24−27 −380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +375%	20−22 −375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +380%	24−27 −380%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +374%	18−20 −374%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +383%	27−30 −383%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +383%	60−65 −383%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 +390%	50−55 −390%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +374%	35−40 −374%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +362%	24−27 −362%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200−210 +376%	40−45 −376%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

170−180

+386%

35−40
−386%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +358%	24−27 −358%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +355%	21−24 −355%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +344%	9−10 −344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +367%	14−16 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +350%	6−7 −350%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +375%	20−22 −375%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +378%	21−24 −378%
Hitman 3	70−75 +367%	14−16 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +380%	24−27 −380%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +375%	20−22 −375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 +375%	20−22 −375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
+375%

20−22

−375%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +344%	9−10 −344%
Hitman 3	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +362%	12−14 −362%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +355%	10−12 −355%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +350%	6−7 −350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +350%	6−7 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +369%	16−18 −369%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +362%	12−14 −362%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%