Radeon Pro 580 vs GeForce GTX 760

Place in performance ranking	368	261
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.34	1.07
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GK104	Polaris 20
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	25 June 2013 (10 years ago)	5 June 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data
Current price	$136 (0.5x MSRP)	$5999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760 has 306% better value for money than Pro 580.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	2304
CUDA cores	1152	no data
Core clock speed	980 MHz	1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	94.1 billion/sec	172.8
Floating-point performance	2,378 gflops	6,175 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon Pro 580 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Minimum recommended system power	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	6780 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	217.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
PhysX	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.38

Pro 580 20.04
+61.9%

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 by 62% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760 4791

Pro 580 7753
+61.8%

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 by 62% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 760 14254

Pro 580 37396
+162%

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 by 162% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 760 13889

Pro 580 43706
+215%

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 by 215% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−49.3%

100−110
+49.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−57.9%

30−33
+57.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −59.1%	70−75 +59.1%
Hitman 3	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −59.1%	70−75 +59.1%
Hitman 3	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −60%	40−45 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −59.1%	70−75 +59.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −60%	40−45 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Hitman 3	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −45.8%	35−40 +45.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Hitman 3	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%

This is how GTX 760 and Pro 580 compete in popular games:

Pro 580 is 49% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.38	20.04
Recency	25 June 2013	5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	150 Watt