RTX A2000 12 GB vs GeForce GTX 760

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.41

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms GTX 760 by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking407141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.5294.08
Power efficiency5.0434.96
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK104GA106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX A2000 12 GB has 1981% better value for money than GTX 760.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11523328
Core clock speed980 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt70 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate99.07124.8
Floating-point processing power2.378 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs96104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm167 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Minimum recommended system power500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 760 12.41
RTX A2000 12 GB 35.47
+186%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760 4799
RTX A2000 12 GB 13714
+186%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD67
−184%
190−200
+184%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.72
−57.3%
2.36
+57.3%
  • RTX A2000 12 GB has 57% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Fortnite 65−70
−179%
190−200
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Valorant 100−110
−179%
290−300
+179%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−168%
450−500
+168%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%
Dota 2 75−80
−178%
220−230
+178%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Fortnite 65−70
−179%
190−200
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
Valorant 100−110
−179%
290−300
+179%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%
Dota 2 75−80
−178%
220−230
+178%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−180%
140−150
+180%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
Valorant 100−110
−179%
290−300
+179%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−179%
190−200
+179%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−184%
250−260
+184%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−176%
210−220
+176%
Valorant 120−130
−176%
350−400
+176%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Valorant 60−65
−174%
170−180
+174%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Dota 2 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

This is how GTX 760 and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 184% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.41 35.47
Recency 25 June 2013 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A2000 12 GB has a 185.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 142.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2164 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 147 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 or RTX A2000 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.