UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
13.08
+232%

760 Ti OEM outperforms Graphics 750 32EUs by a whopping 232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking416742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.90no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGK104Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 September 2013 (12 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134432
Core clock speed915 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate109.8no data
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+213%
16
−213%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 760 Ti OEM and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 Ti OEM is 213% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 39 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.08 3.94
Recency 27 September 2013 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

GTX 760 Ti OEM has a 232% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
R7 250 R7 250
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
R9 M270X R9 M270X
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
GT 430 OEM GT 430 OEM
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q 1050 Max-Q
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Playstation 3 GPU 65nm 3 GPU 65nm
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
PRO V710 PRO V710
GTX 780 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 7500 All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500
GTX 780 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000-8Q
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 750 GM206 750 GM206
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 95 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.