UHD Graphics 605 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by 1098% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 346 | 1029 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.31 | 0.54 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Gen. 9 Apollo Lake (2016−2017) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | Gemini Lake |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 September 2013 (10 years ago) | 11 December 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Current price | $229 | $458 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 760 Ti OEM has 513% better value for money than UHD Graphics 605.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1344 | 18 |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 109.8 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and UHD Graphics 605 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Length | 241 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 / LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by 1098% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by 1098% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 140−150
+1067%
| 12
−1067%
|
| 1440p | 280−290
+1067%
| 24
−1067%
|
| 4K | 170−180
+1033%
| 15
−1033%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.02 | 1.17 |
| Recency | 27 September 2013 | 11 December 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 5 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 605 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
