Radeon HD 6990M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6950M 6970M 6970M Crossfire 6970M Mac Edition 6970M Rebrand 6970M X2 6990M 6990M Crossfire 6990M Rebrand

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM with Radeon HD 6990M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.38
+175%

760 Ti OEM outperforms HD 6990M by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM
HD 6990M HD 6990M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking417678
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.883.63
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Blackcomb
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 September 2013 (12 years ago)12 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13441120
Core clock speed915 MHz715 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate109.840.04
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS1.602 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11256
L1 Cache112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p140−150
+159%
54
−159%
Full HD160−170
+167%
60
−167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 760 Ti OEM and HD 6990M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 Ti OEM is 159% faster in 900p
  • GTX 760 Ti OEM is 167% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.38 4.50
Recency 27 September 2013 12 July 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 760 Ti OEM has a 175.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6990M, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 6990M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
AMD Radeon HD 6990M
Radeon HD 6990M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
HD 6990M Radeon HD 6990M
vs
GTX 670MX GeForce GTX 670MX
GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
GTX 690 GeForce GTX 690
GTX 745 OEM NVIDIA GTX 745 OEM
vs
605 OEM 605 OEM
GTX 750 NVIDIA GTX 750
vs
E9175 PCIe E9175 PCIe
GTX 750 NVIDIA GTX 750
vs
HD 8370D IGP 8370D IGP
GTX 750 NVIDIA GTX 750
vs
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16 GB
GTX 650 NVIDIA GTX 650
vs
R5 A320 A320
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
GeForce 840A 840A
GTX 780 6 GB NVIDIA GTX 780 6 GB
vs
605 OEM 605 OEM
GTX 780 6 GB NVIDIA GTX 780 6 GB
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand NVIDIA GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
ATI Xbox 360 E GPU 360 E GPU
GTX 760 OEM NVIDIA GTX 760 OEM
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5450 5450

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 94 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM or Radeon HD 6990M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.