ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM with Mobility Radeon HD 5850, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
13.09
+652%

760 Ti OEM outperforms Mobility HD 5850 by a whopping 652% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM
ATI Mobility HD 5850 Mobility HD 5850

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking420976
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.914.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Broadway
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 September 2013 (12 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344800
Core clock speed915 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate109.820.00
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11240
L1 Cache112 KB80 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p140−150
+637%
19
−637%
Full HD180−190
+620%
25
−620%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 760 Ti OEM and ATI Mobility HD 5850 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 Ti OEM is 637% faster in 900p
  • GTX 760 Ti OEM is 620% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.09 1.74
Recency 27 September 2013 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 760 Ti OEM has a 652.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5850, on the other hand, has 466.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5850 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310
ATI Mobility HD 5850 Mobility Radeon HD 5850
vs
GeForce 920M GeForce 920M
GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
GTX 650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
vs
RTX A4000H RTX A4000H
GTX 650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
vs
RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000-8Q
GT 635 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
vs
ATI WinCharger WinCharger
GT 635 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
vs
Arc 3 A350M 3 A350M
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
R7 M360 R7 M360
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
GT 640 GT 640
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
510 OEM GeForce 510 OEM
GTX 780 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
6200 SE TurboCache GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile
GTX 780 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
vs
Jetson TX1 Jetson TX1

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 95 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM or Mobility Radeon HD 5850, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.