GeForce RTX 4080 vs GTX 760 Ti OEM

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and GeForce RTX 4080, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
14.11

RTX 4080 outperforms GTX 760 Ti OEM by a whopping 538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.05
Power efficiency5.7319.40
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13449728
Core clock speed915 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate109.8761.5
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs112304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm310 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 Ti OEM 14.11
RTX 4080 89.96
+538%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760 Ti OEM 5427
RTX 4080 34593
+537%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−577%
237
+577%
1440p24−27
−588%
165
+588%
4K16−18
−569%
107
+569%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.06
1440pno data7.27
4Kno data11.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 231
+0%
231
+0%
Elden Ring 274
+0%
274
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 217
+0%
217
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 115
+0%
115
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 527
+0%
527
+0%
Metro Exodus 173
+0%
173
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 751
+0%
751
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 202
+0%
202
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 105
+0%
105
+0%
Dota 2 201
+0%
201
+0%
Elden Ring 420
+0%
420
+0%
Far Cry 5 155
+0%
155
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 512
+0%
512
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 172
+0%
172
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 550−600
+0%
550−600
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 187
+0%
187
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Dota 2 233
+0%
233
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 480
+0%
480
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 575
+0%
575
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 162
+0%
162
+0%
Elden Ring 246
+0%
246
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 125
+0%
125
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 390
+0%
390
+0%
Metro Exodus 149
+0%
149
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191
+0%
191
+0%
Valorant 485
+0%
485
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Dota 2 185
+0%
185
+0%
Elden Ring 148
+0%
148
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 185
+0%
185
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185
+0%
185
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 227
+0%
227
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 195
+0%
195
+0%
Valorant 245
+0%
245
+0%

This is how GTX 760 Ti OEM and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 577% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 is 588% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 is 569% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.11 89.96
Recency 27 September 2013 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 320 Watt

GTX 760 Ti OEM has 88.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 537.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 84 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4543 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.