GeForce GT 750M SLI vs GTX 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 750 with GeForce GT 750M SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 750
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
8.67
+25.7%

GTX 750 outperforms GT 750M SLI by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking464526
Place by popularity64not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.851.33
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM107N14P-GT
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119 no data
Current price$340 (2.9x MSRP)$545

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 750M SLI has 56% better value for money than GTX 750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1020 MHz967 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1300 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.72no data
Floating-point performance1,111 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 750 and GeForce GT 750M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length5.7" (14.5 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed5.0 GB/s2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIno data
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 8.67
+25.7%
GT 750M SLI 6.90

GTX 750 outperforms GT 750M SLI by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 3970
+7.2%
GT 750M SLI 3703

GTX 750 outperforms GT 750M SLI by 7% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+25%
68
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

This is how GTX 750 and GT 750M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 750 is 25% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.67 6.90
Recency 18 February 2014 1 April 2013

The GeForce GTX 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 is a desktop card while GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2127 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.