UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GeForce GTX 750 v2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1067
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.61
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameGM206Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 November 2015 (9 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51224
Core clock speed1038 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate38.02no data
Floating-point processing power1.217 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5012 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12_1
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2015 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 v2 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 v2 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
GeForce GTX 750 v2
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 67 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 130 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 750 v2 or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.