Radeon Instinct MI200 vs GeForce GT 740 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGK106Aldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 April 2015 (10 years ago)December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846656
Core clock speed1050 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate33.60707.2
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs32416
L1 Cache32 KB1.6 MB
L2 Cache256 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s1,638 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

GT 740 OEM has 361.5% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI200, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 740 OEM and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 OEM
GeForce GT 740 OEM
AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 11 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 740 OEM or Radeon Instinct MI200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.