Radeon HD 8310E vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Place in performance ranking	412	1091
Place by popularity	20	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.11	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	GM107	Kalindi
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)	23 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$357 (2.4x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	128
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.40	2.400
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.10
+1048%

HD 8310E 0.88

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 8310E by 1048% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 750 Ti 3902
+1048%

HD 8310E 340

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 8310E by 1048% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

49
+1125%

4−5

−1125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

180−190
+1025%

16−18

−1025%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +1033%	14−16 −1033%
Battlefield 5	350−400 +994%	30−35 −994%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	220−230 +1000%	20−22 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Far Cry 5	260−270 +1030%	21−24 −1030%
Far Cry New Dawn	300−310 +971%	27−30 −971%
Forza Horizon 4	550−600 +1022%	45−50 −1022%
Hitman 3	210−220 +1005%	18−20 −1005%
Horizon Zero Dawn	450−500 +947%	40−45 −947%
Metro Exodus	350−400 +1029%	30−35 −1029%
Red Dead Redemption 2	300−310 +971%	27−30 −971%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 +1029%	30−35 −1029%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +1011%	35−40 −1011%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +1033%	14−16 −1033%
Battlefield 5	350−400 +994%	30−35 −994%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	220−230 +1000%	20−22 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Far Cry 5	260−270 +1030%	21−24 −1030%
Far Cry New Dawn	300−310 +971%	27−30 −971%
Forza Horizon 4	550−600 +1022%	45−50 −1022%
Hitman 3	210−220 +1005%	18−20 −1005%
Horizon Zero Dawn	450−500 +947%	40−45 −947%
Metro Exodus	350−400 +1029%	30−35 −1029%
Red Dead Redemption 2	300−310 +971%	27−30 −971%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 +1029%	30−35 −1029%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +1011%	35−40 −1011%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +1033%	14−16 −1033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	220−230 +1000%	20−22 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Far Cry 5	260−270 +1030%	21−24 −1030%
Forza Horizon 4	550−600 +1022%	45−50 −1022%
Horizon Zero Dawn	450−500 +947%	40−45 −947%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 +1029%	30−35 −1029%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +1011%	35−40 −1011%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

300−310
+971%

27−30

−971%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	220−230 +1000%	20−22 −1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	190−200 +1018%	16−18 −1018%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +983%	6−7 −983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +983%	12−14 −983%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Far Cry 5	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +1005%	18−20 −1005%
Hitman 3	140−150 +977%	12−14 −977%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Metro Exodus	170−180 +1033%	14−16 −1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +977%	12−14 −977%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

190−200
+1018%

16−18

−1018%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +1043%	7−8 −1043%
Hitman 3	65−70 +983%	6−7 −983%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +991%	10−12 −991%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +1025%	8−9 −1025%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +983%	6−7 −983%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +977%	12−14 −977%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +991%	10−12 −991%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%