GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs GTX 750 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 750 Ti with GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 750 Ti
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
10.13

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms GTX 750 Ti by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking443210
Place by popularity2953
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.99no data
Power efficiency11.6024.09
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM107GA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402560
Core clock speed1020 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1035 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate43.4082.80
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs4080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.13
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.31
+160%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 750 Ti 3900
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10134
+160%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 750 Ti 5378
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
+236%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 750 Ti 4294
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360
+211%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 750 Ti 31349
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 72925
+133%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−47.1%
75
+47.1%
1440p16−18
−163%
42
+163%
4K9−10
−178%
25
+178%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.92no data
1440p9.31no data
4K16.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−288%
62
+288%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−300%
60
+300%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−156%
80−85
+156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−269%
59
+269%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−118%
140−150
+118%
Hitman 3 18−20
−321%
80
+321%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−109%
110−120
+109%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−347%
143
+347%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−250%
98
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−267%
231
+267%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−133%
35
+133%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−156%
80−85
+156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−181%
45
+181%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−118%
140−150
+118%
Hitman 3 18−20
−305%
77
+305%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−109%
110−120
+109%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−256%
114
+256%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−179%
78
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−218%
105
+218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−100%
50−55
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−222%
203
+222%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−73.3%
26
+73.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40
+150%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−118%
140−150
+118%
Hitman 3 18−20
−253%
67
+253%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−67.3%
92
+67.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−173%
90
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−85.2%
50
+85.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+125%
28
−125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−189%
81
+189%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−135%
45−50
+135%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−153%
35−40
+153%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−333%
26
+333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−180%
27−30
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−340%
22
+340%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−142%
27−30
+142%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−218%
140−150
+218%
Hitman 3 12−14
−254%
46
+254%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−229%
69
+229%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−300%
60
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−369%
61
+369%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−117%
139
+117%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−229%
56
+229%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−178%
24−27
+178%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Hitman 3 6−7
−233%
20
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−191%
120−130
+191%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−263%
29
+263%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−162%
30−35
+162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−386%
34
+386%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−190%
29
+190%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 47% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 163% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 178% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 125% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.13 26.31
Recency 18 February 2014 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 750 Ti has 25% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 159.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9
6594 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
4233 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.