Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.19
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Navi 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data15 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9602560
Core clock speed1033 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1098 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate87.84164.8
Floating-point processing powerno data5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs80160
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed6 GB/s770 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1751.2
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and Radeon Pro 5600M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 171 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.