Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.42
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9601536
Core clock speed1033 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1098 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate87.84139.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs8096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1751.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 85 Watt

Pro 5500M has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 76.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and Radeon Pro 5500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 145 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 300 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM or Radeon Pro 5500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.