GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GTX 680MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce GT 755M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 680MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
10.77
+23.8%

GTX 680MX outperforms GT 755M SLI by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking430497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.096.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataN14P-?
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speed720 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million2x 1300 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt2x ~50 Watt
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/secno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2x 2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680MX 10.77
+23.8%
GT 755M SLI 8.70

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 680MX 6736
+18.7%
GT 755M SLI 5673

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 680MX 25501
+23.6%
GT 755M SLI 20627

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+55.6%
36
−55.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Valorant 40−45
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Dota 2 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+16.2%
35−40
−16.2%
Fortnite 60−65
+21.6%
50−55
−21.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+18.8%
65−70
−18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Valorant 40−45
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%
World of Tanks 150−160
+18.6%
120−130
−18.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Dota 2 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+16.2%
35−40
−16.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+18.8%
65−70
−18.8%
Valorant 40−45
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+18.6%
40−45
−18.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
World of Tanks 75−80
+22.2%
60−65
−22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Valorant 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Fortnite 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Valorant 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

This is how GTX 680MX and GT 755M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680MX is 56% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 680MX is 67% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 680MX is ahead in 62 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.77 8.70
Recency 23 October 2012 1 November 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 2 Watt

GTX 680MX has a 23.8% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 755M SLI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 6000% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 680MX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.