FirePro S7100X vs GeForce GTX 680MX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking430not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.13no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)25 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362048
Core clock speed720 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec92.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.97 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 25 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 100 Watt

S7100X has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 22% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680MX and FirePro S7100X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680MX is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S7100X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
AMD FirePro S7100X
FirePro S7100X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro S7100X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.