ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 680M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking566not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.47no data
Power efficiency6.02no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGK104R423
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2012 (13 years ago)1 December 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$310.50 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344no data
Core clock speed719 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt54 Watt
Texture fill rate84.907.600
Floating-point processing power2.038 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs11216
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP Pro 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2012 1 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 54 Watt

GTX 680M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X800 XT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 85.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GeForce GTX 680M
ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition
Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 67 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680M or Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.