Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition vs GeForce GTX 680M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 566 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.47 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.02 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 June 2012 (13 years ago) | 7 August 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $310.50 | $549 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1344 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | 1536 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 295 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 84.90 | 393.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.038 TFLOPS | 12.58 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 282 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 June 2012 | 7 August 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 295 Watt |
GTX 680M has 195% lower power consumption.
RX Vega 64 Limited Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
