ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs GeForce GTX 680M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 563 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.48 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.02 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Rage 8 (2002−2007) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | R300 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 June 2012 (13 years ago) | 1 July 2002 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $310.50 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1344 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 325 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 110 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 84.90 | 2.600 ×4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.038 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | 8 ×4 |
| TMUs | 112 | 8 ×4 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCI |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x Molex |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB ×4 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit ×4 |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 310 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 19.84 GB/s ×4 |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 9.0 (9_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 June 2012 | 1 July 2002 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 150 nm |
GTX 680M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
